{"id":14086,"date":"2021-03-24T00:03:51","date_gmt":"2021-03-24T00:03:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ginx.tv\/100t-refutes-riot-s-vct-masters-decision-with-video-evidence"},"modified":"2024-07-19T07:29:36","modified_gmt":"2024-07-19T07:29:36","slug":"100t-refutes-riot-s-vct-masters-decision-with-video-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ginx.tv\/en\/valorant\/100t-refutes-riot-s-vct-masters-decision-with-video-evidence","title":{"rendered":"100T refutes Riot’s VCT Masters decision with video evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"
100 Thieves has issued a statement<\/a> opposing Riot’s decision to fine them 5,000 USD<\/a> and putting head coach Hector “FrosT” Rosario on probation following a discussion with the Valorant Masters tournament organizers.<\/p>\n In its statement, Riot said that “FrosT displayed unprofessional behavior in interaction with a Tournament Official” going as far as threatening staff using 100T’s social media reach as “leverage.”<\/p>\n According to 100 Thieves, this is a complete “mischaracterization of the incident,” which stemmed from the coaching staff pressing for a server change after being put in a disadvantageous position two times in a row during the event.<\/p>\n “In a previous match vs TSM, the tournament organizer made a ruling regarding ping & servers that favored our opponent. In our subsequent match vs IMT, the TO again made a ruling around ping & servers that was not in our favor, and which was in direct contradiction with the rules they cited previously in the TSM match,” the statement reads.<\/p>\n The team opted to delay the match while FrosT was arguing with the organizers. 100T provided evidence of the discussion recorded on their training facilities, claiming at no point they “threatened to leverage social media as was stated by Riot.”<\/p>\n
(Image: 100 Thieves)<\/span><\/p>\n