Pro players discuss whether The International is good for Dota 2
Published on October 28th, 2018
The International. Not just the biggest Dota 2 tournament of the year, in terms of prize money in esports, itâ€™s unparalleled. TI 2018 reached $25,532,177 in prize money, and the winners OG took home over $11 million. But is The International good for the Dota 2 scene? With all that attention and all that money involved, itâ€™s hard to see any downsides. This is the Super Bowl, the World Cup, and the best teams in the world are competing. But what about the other teams in Dota? The teams that didnâ€™t make it to the grandest stage of them all this year, and never really had a chance to? I had the chance to get the perspective from a range of pro players. [caption id="attachment_106411" align="alignnone" width="600"] Credit: Mark Roe/Red Bull[/caption] â€œFor me personally, itâ€™s perfect,â€ said Damien â€˜kpiiâ€™ Chok, who plays for Mineski. â€œNothing comes close to it, not even the Majors,â€ said Aliwi â€˜w33â€™ Omar of paiN Gaming. They both love The International, but theyâ€™ve also got one thing in common. When he was on Newbee, kpii came second at TI 2015. When he was with Digital Chaos, w33 came second at TI 2016. Itâ€™s estimated that theyâ€™ve both individually won over a million dollars in prize money alone through their careers. The International has changed their lives. What about for players who have never been? The International is huge, and perhaps maybe too big for the good of the scene. â€œOverall the Dota 2 scene is very unique,â€ said Brian â€˜BananaSlamJammaâ€™ Canavan, a popular streamer, analyst, and pro player for ROOONS. â€œThereâ€™s a heavy emphasis on prize pools as opposed to consistent salaries. TI is something that causes a lot of issues because of how large that prize pool is, the way teams form, and the way that organisation of the rest of the tournaments gets affected. It shouldnâ€™t have to be that way.â€ [caption id="attachment_106435" align="alignnone" width="600"] Credit: Team Liquid[/caption] But BananaSlamJamma doesnâ€™t think The International is necessarily the problem. Itâ€™s the fact that finding a long-term sponsor for your team is hard unless your team is already at the top and winning. If your team is going to TI, a sponsor will want in. If thereâ€™s a risk you wonâ€™t qualify, they might be better off spending their money elsewhere. â€œSponsors need some motivation to actually salary teams that arenâ€™t going to win or get top 8 in TI,â€ he said. â€œThis year they finally took a step in the right direction. Last year every tournament had two or three slots, so theyâ€™d go to OpTic, EG, plus one. Now suddenly you have the Minor Major system where four or five teams go. Thatâ€™s a good step.â€ One of the problems at the moment is that salaries for most teams just arenâ€™t competitive. It would be more beneficial for a player to jump ship to a team who might be able to get to TI rather than sticking around and taking low income from their current team. Because even coming last in that one tournament will often grant you a better paycheck. â€œIf youâ€™re regularly salaried and sponsors are willing to pay for you, thatâ€™s way more important to me than one big paycheck from TI. One of the biggest problems is [playing Dota professionally] is not a stable job as of yet, but it has come a long way in the past five years. I get a paycheck based on subscribers, how often I stream. A lot of these players donâ€™t know if theyâ€™re getting paid. Other scenes have done a better job of that. â€œPlayers around Tier 2 or 3 that are on the verge of qualifying or on the verge of placing decently in tournaments, theyâ€™re making maybe $1,000-$2,000 a year from competitive. Thatâ€™s nothing you can live off. I know some players who have quit Dota, and they were probably going to be good enough to be Tier 1. But if youâ€™re telling them that for two years you have to live in poverty, you canâ€™t expect that from people. â€œSponsors right now in Dota are making the rich richer, rather than giving other teams a chance. TI contributed to that, but I donâ€™t think changing that is how you fix it.â€ [caption id="attachment_106437" align="alignnone" width="600"] Credit: Valve[/caption] Of course, for the spectators, thereâ€™s nothing better than The International, and kpii doesnâ€™t believe changing it for the good of lower end teams is the right way forward. â€œThatâ€™s only like 0.1% of the Dota population,â€ he said. â€œThis style right now means we have a higher percentage of interests covered. The grand picture, players, audience, everything combined, I think it's the best way.â€ And although BananaSlamJamma believes â€œit would be better for the scene if it didnâ€™t have one gigantic tournament,â€ he canâ€™t deny the benefits that The International does bring. â€œNo other scene has something comparable, and thatâ€™s pretty cool for Dota,â€ he said. â€œPeople who donâ€™t watch Dota all year end up watching, itâ€™s a huge stage and you get to see the quality of Dota you donâ€™t get to see the rest of the year.â€ The International in its current form is certainly not going away any time soon. Not only because of the prestige and the attention it brings to Dota, but also because it makes Valve so much money. TI is not the problem affecting lower tier Dota, but itâ€™s part of it. â€œIf you want people to break into Tier 1 Dota, you have to give them the means,â€ said BananaSlamJamma. Whether Valve and potential sponsors are willing to take the chance is a very big question.